Asian American actors and performers have gathered forces to figure out the meaning behind a slew of statistics. Data revealed in a 2012 study has found the smoking gun — that Asian American performers are not part of “the trend toward more inclusive casting” in New York theater.
According to the new statistical report, “MCC Theater was the only theatre studied that hired no minority actors at all this season,” the report said.
Back in December Gaele Sobott published an interview with Amit Sharma on her blog, Gaele Sobott:Writing, Culture, Social Justice and….
The post was entitled:
The conversation is about a play he recently directed, The Solid Life of Sugar Water. The play centers on relationship, sexuality, and disability, hot topics for most of us. I hope you will visit Gaele’s blog and read the entire interview.
Sobott introduced the director thusly:
Amit Sharma has been the Associate Director of Graeae Theatre Company, London, since 2011. He recently directed The Solid Life of Sugar Water, a Graeae Theatre Company and Theatre Royal Plymouth production, gaining unanimous acclaim at the 2015 Edinburgh Festival Fringe, leading to a 2016 UK tour including a run at the National Theatre…..
Here is a brief excerpt from the interview:
GS: The audience are looking down on the bed but they are also being spoken to directly by the characters. It is not possible for the audience to position themselves as just observers. They have to participate. What are your thoughts on this?
AS: That’s the good thing about theatre. You can set up a convention and then just totally break it. So whenever the characters were on the floor, that was like the wall of their bedroom but it became less about the bedroom, it was the post office, the bridge, even though the bed was always present. As a creative team we wanted it to be subtle, so yes the bed was always in the background because there was always that big question of them trying to have sex.
GS: There are many disabled artists and directors who feel there is a need to explore sex and disability, for various reasons including societal attitudes, the infantilisation of disabled people. What is the importance of sex in disabled art? What is the relation of this play to the exploration of sex and disability?
AS: The most interesting thing coming out of Sugar Water is that question has not been asked. It has not been unpacked. What the play does is almost normalise that very question of sex and disability. It is such a huge topic for so many different reasons. Perhaps it is because of the performers, one performer is Deaf and one performer has a physical impairment, but not to the extent where it impacts on their sex lives. What I mean by that is that if, say, one of the characters was a wheelchair user who had 24 hour personal care then that dynamic shifts. I was reading an article today about the Independent Living Fund and this guy saying how it can be difficult to live independently for example to go out and chat up girls because you’ve got someone else there all the time. So you have to negotiate that relationship. This play doesn’t go there. People have picked up on the element of communication between the couple, but the sex element not so. I also think it is because of how Jack as a writer was playing with the idea of sex. There’s a lot of comedy with some really graphic descriptions.
GS: Well yes there is comedy and there are very serious moments, a fine line.
I imagine I became fond of watching and listening to sports in part, because I am an American male, and in part because I had Polio and could not really play them. Radio and television allowed me to imagine I was an athlete, to participate in some small, crucial way in the lives of able men. Anyway, I remember imagining that I, too, could be a heroic athlete, that somehow my Polio body could be transcended.
This afternoon I watched a few minutes of the Patriots game. When I tuned in, a Bills’ player was being immobilized, having experienced a serious neck injury. The Patriots had achieved an enormous lead and the injury seemed both heartbreaking and senseless.
Over the past few years it has become evident that American professional football (as opposed to soccer), in spite of its phenomenal popularity, is hugely problematic. Life changing physical injuries, head traumas, and incidents of domestic violence are much too common. Indeed, the sport seems to require and condone violence, sacrificing players and their loved ones on a regular basis.
I have followed the Patriots for many years and, over time, have come to greatly appreciate Tom Brady, who is unquestionably a hall of fame quarterback. This week, however, Brady appeared to come out put in support of his friend, Donald Trump’s, bit for the Presidency of the United States. This in spite of Trump’s overt racism, misogyny, and hatred of religious and ethnic minorities, and those with disabilities or non-dominant sexual orientations. Trump has also demonstrated a long-standing dislike for Native America, and this week he reputedly agreed with a debate questioner that a Muslim should not be President, and said he would consider ways to rid the country of Muslims.
I have been trying to understand why Brady would publicly support someone who spews hatred towards the people he depends on for his life and career. After all, he is married to a woman, has Afro-American, Asian, and Hispanic teammates (some probably Muslim) who PROTECT him on and off the field, and works in Boston, an ethnically rich and diverse community. He clearly is entitled to his opinions. Yet, why would he publicly say suggest he agrees with Trump’s views? I am left wondering, “What is he thinking?” Perhaps he is as arrogant as many in the media seem to believe.
I’m offended, after all, I’m Native and disabled. I hope you are offended as well.
Our workshop at the International Playback Theatre Network conference in Montreal provided an opportunity for directors, and individual performers, to think with us about disability, inclusion, and aesthetics. The time allotted to the workshop passed much too quickly as we engaged in a deep conversation about these difficult topics.
One of the most challenging aspects of any conversation about theater and disability is making the distinction between theater for, theater by, theater to, and theater with. Still other categories have been suggested, perhaps in an effort to thicken our understanding of this thorny topic.
These distinctions have evolved to address the difference between theater practices that nominally include persons with disabilities, those provide programing to persons labeled as disabled, and those that seek to be truly inclusive. The latter may originate in group or individual work by disabled persons, or by ensembles of “mixed abilities,” in which the presence of disability is acknowledged, but normalized, resulting in an aesthetic that explores the differently abled body-mind as a vehicle for storytelling in myriad ways. Continue reading
This morning I read the following post from Juliana Farha, posted on her blog, Two Worlds: Notes and Observations. The post, Why Music? Notes on Reciprocity, struck a deep note within me. Juliana writes:
Although she dreamt of learning the cello, my sister never played an instrument. She loved to sing but her voice wasn’t especially good: our annual duet of The Boar’s Head Carol at Christmas was as close to choral performance as she ever got. And yet Darya’s connection with music was so profound, her sense of the musicality of life with its singular and idiosyncratic rhythms so innate, she was one of the most musical people I’ve known.
Darya died of breast cancer more than three years ago, and in less than a month’s time The Forge in central London will host the premiere of Reciprocity, a half-hour chamber work based on her poetry which I commissioned from the exciting young composer Daniel Patrick Cohen……
Jennie read and reviewed the newly released book, Dancing with Diana. Here is a bit of her review:
“Thoroughly enjoyed Dancing with Diana. I was appreciative of the way in which Diana’s story is interwoven with Alex’s story-I also deeply appreciated the first person narrative of a young man in a socially and physically non-cooperative body. For both, in the end, a story about being bullied. We are with him as he grows up and finds his authentic voice. A book in which there are multiple teachable moments within the pages.”
“The future Princess Diana dances for five minutes with a teenage boy in a wheelchair, an encounter that colors the rest of his life, though quickly forgotten by her. Alex’s story is told in counterpoint with Diana’s final day before her fatal accident in Paris. All day she tries to reach a friend in London, hoping to hear news that will bring a new direction to her life.”
Take a look at Dancing with Diana!
Here is a profound piece of writing from Kaite O’Reilly. In a blog post entitled, Answering back and returning the gaze: Alternative Dramaturgies, she speaks of her work playwrighting disability:
How do we ‘write’ disability? Is it in the aesthetic, the narratives, the content, the form, or the bodies of the performers? This paper seeks to introduce ‘alternative dramaturgies, informed by a Deaf and disability perspective’, exploring some of the dramaturgical developments I have initiated as a playwright working within disability arts and Deaf culture since 1987. Alternative? To the mainstream, hearing, non-disabled perspective, and by ‘alternative dramaturgies’ I mean the processes, structures, content and form which reinvent, subvert or critique ‘traditional’ or ’conventional’ representations, narratives, and dramatic structures in performance